Search for: "CONSOLIDATED ELEVATOR CO., INC."
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2024, 11:00 pm
’s employer and the utility company “raised an issue of fact” as to whether S.C. work was protected by the state’s Labor Laws.Upon reversing the lower court’s dismissal decision, and reinstating the claims, the AD1 unequivocally noted that an open manhole was an “elevation-related risk” that was subject to the Labor Law’s protections.There sure was some hole in that argument.# # #DECISIONC. v Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y.,… [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 9:24 pm
In re Elevator Safety Co., Serial Nos. 76507505 (February 21, 2007) [not precedential].Functionality: Applying the Morton-Norwich factors (In re Morton-Norwich Prods., Inc., 213 USPQ 9 (CCPA 1982)), the Board began by considering several third-party utility patents. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 1:29 am
Co., Inc., 10 N.Y.3d 333 (2008) that when the statute -- which requires that owners and contractors give workers "proper protection" against elevation related risks (both falling from scaffolds and ladders, or being struck by falling objects) -- says "owners," that includes out-of-possession landlords. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 10:35 am
"In a unanimous opinion, the First Department affirmed the dismissal of plaintiff's Labor Law § 240(1) claim, holding that plaintiff "was not protected by the statute since his duties as a flagman did not entail elevation-related risks"(citing Rocovich v Consolidated Edison Co., 78 NY2d 509, 514 [1991]; Modeste v Mega Constr. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 4:59 am
Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc. (1st Dept. 2016) the trial judge’s reductions have been affirmed. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 8:55 am
Co., 81 NY2d 494, 500-501 [1993], quoting Rocovich v Consolidated Edison Co., 78 NY2d 509, 514 [1991]). [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 5:37 am
§ 1407, and Transfers Actions to Southern District of New York Thirty (30) individual and class action lawsuits were filed against Bank of America and other defendants arising out of “alleged misrepresentations and omissions made in the context of Bank of America’s acquisition of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:17 am
York Hunter Constr., Inc., 95 N.Y.2d. 883, 885 (2000)(slipping while climbing out of a construction vehicle is not an elevation related risk calling for a protective device). [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am
More than 80% of the beef in the U.S. is likewise currently processed by just four companies: Cargill, Tyson Foods, JBS USA, and National Beef Packing Co. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
Courtesy of LAWA The bonds were underwritten by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Ramirez & Co., Inc. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 1:14 pm
" Consolidated Edison, 305 U.S. at 229. [read post]
19 May 2010, 3:31 am
Consolidated Freightways, Inc. 140 N.J. 452 (NJ 1995), the Supreme Court unanimously recognized that an occupational heart condition is compensable under the Workers' Compensation Act. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 am
Consolidated Edison Co., 409 F. 3d 506 (6/2/05) - Affirmed denial of a temporary injunction in a case brought by a terminated employee. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
This mouthful of a phrase refers to a legal doctrine, approved by the Supreme Court in Parklane Hosiery Co. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 2:44 pm
See Performance Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am
Perrier Group of America Inc., 986 F. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 5:48 pm
In Rocovich v Consolidated Edison Co. (78 NY2d 509 [1991]), we clarified that "extent of the elevation differential" (here, measured by the depth of the trench) is not necessarily dispositive (id. at 514) and on this basis I conclude that based on plaintiff's deposition testimony as to the depth of the trench (which we must take as true for purposes of deciding defendants' motions for summary judgment), there was a significant elevation… [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 1:55 pm
Supreme Court’s 2021 decision in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:26 am
AT&T Inc., et al. (09-1279). [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:51 am
The elevation of Matt, Kevin, Lauren and Chris into their new roles is one of the most rewarding outcomes for me personally,” said Petrini-Poli. [read post]
